Materiality determines which environmental and social topics belong in your sustainability strategy and disclosure. Standard frameworks were designed for formal-sector companies in stable economies — they often miss what is genuinely material in African operating contexts. This matrix maps materiality across two dimensions: significance to investors and capital markets, and significance to the communities in which you operate. The overlap is where your stewardship strategy should be anchored.
Work through this tool with your leadership team. The matrix is most useful as a facilitated conversation, not a solo exercise.
| Organisation | Date | Completed by |
|---|---|---|
Part 1 — Sustainability Topic Inventory
List up to 12 sustainability topics relevant to your organisation. Include topics from standard frameworks (climate, governance, labour) AND topics specific to your African operating context (informal economy, land rights, community dependency, supply chain informality).
| # | Sustainability topic | Investor significance (1–5) | Community significance (1–5) | Combined score | Materiality tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | |||||
| 02 | |||||
| 03 | |||||
| 04 | |||||
| 05 | |||||
| 06 | |||||
| 07 | |||||
| 08 | |||||
| 09 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 |
Scoring guide — Investor Significance: Would this topic affect access to capital, investor confidence, or regulatory standing? Community Significance: Would this topic affect the trust, well-being, or livelihoods of communities connected to your operations?
Materiality Tier Guide
Tier 1: Core Priority (combined score 8–10). This topic is highly material. It belongs in your strategy, your board reporting, and your sustainability disclosure. These are the issues you must address — not because a framework requires it, but because they genuinely determine your long-term relevance and trust.
Tier 2: Important (combined score 5–7). This topic matters but is not your highest priority. Monitor it actively, report on it where relevant, and build toward addressing it in the next strategic cycle.
Tier 3: Monitor (combined score 2–4). Currently lower materiality. Keep it on your radar — context changes, and a topic that is low priority today may become urgent with a regulatory shift or a change in community dynamics.
Part 2 — Stewardship Materiality Matrix
Plot each topic from Part 1 by its scores. Topics in the top-right quadrant are your core stewardship priorities — they belong in your strategy, disclosure, and board reporting.
| Quadrant | Action |
|---|---|
| High Investor · Low Community → Compliance Focus | Manage for regulatory and investor requirements. Write topic names or numbers here. |
| High Investor · High Community → Core Stewardship Priority | These are your material issues. Build strategy and disclosure here. Write topic names or numbers here. |
| Low Investor · Low Community → Monitor | Not currently material. Review annually. Write topic names or numbers here. |
| Low Investor · High Community → Social Licence Focus | Critical for community trust even if not investor-facing. Write topic names or numbers here. |
Part 3 — Priority Stewardship Commitments
For each core stewardship priority (top-right quadrant), define how your organisation will address it.
| Material topic | Current practice | Target / commitment | Metric | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
What This Matrix Tells You
| Pattern | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Most topics top-right | Deep integration between your business operations and the communities you affect. Your stewardship strategy is likely to be credible and defensible — now it needs to be documented and disclosed with rigour. |
| Most topics top-left | Your sustainability approach is currently investor-facing rather than community-integrated. Your disclosures may satisfy regulators but may not reflect genuine social licence. |
| Most topics bottom | The topics you have identified may not yet be the right ones. Revisit with broader stakeholder input, particularly from the communities closest to your operations. |