How is your organisation's story landing with the people who matter most? Map where your narrative is strong, where it is weak, and where the gap between actual impact and perceived influence is largest.
By The Muyi Group
Narrative Capital is the reserve of credibility, trust, and clarity that determines how an organisation is perceived by the audiences whose support it needs. This audit maps where your narrative is strong, where it is weak, and where the gap between your actual impact and your perceived influence is largest.
Complete this tool with your leadership team — the conversation it generates is as valuable as the scores. Repeat the scoring for each of your three critical audiences.
Organisation
Date
Completed by
Step 1 — Identify Your Three Critical Audiences
Name the three audiences whose perception matters most to your ability to earn influence and sustain your work. Be specific: not “investors” but “East African DFIs” or “private foundations.”
#
Audience name
Why they matter
Current relationship status
A
B
C
The sections below are completed once per audience — A, B, then C. Three separate passes produce three distinct profiles. The differences between them are often the most revealing part of the audit.
Step 2 — Narrative Profile: Audience A
Audience A name
Rate your narrative on each dimension. 1 = Weak 2 = Below average 3 = Average 4 = Strong 5 = Excellent
Dimension
What we are assessing
1
2
3
4
5
Clarity
They understand clearly what we do and why it matters
Credibility
They believe and trust our impact claims
Distinctiveness
We stand out clearly from similar organisations
Relevance
Our story speaks to what they care about
Consistency
Our narrative is the same across all touchpoints
Evidence
Our claims are backed by specific, verifiable proof
Currency
Our story reflects where we are today, not the past
Total score /35
Most important narrative gap with Audience A
Step 2 — Narrative Profile: Audience B
Audience B name
Rate your narrative on each dimension. 1 = Weak 2 = Below average 3 = Average 4 = Strong 5 = Excellent
Dimension
What we are assessing
1
2
3
4
5
Clarity
They understand clearly what we do and why it matters
Credibility
They believe and trust our impact claims
Distinctiveness
We stand out clearly from similar organisations
Relevance
Our story speaks to what they care about
Consistency
Our narrative is the same across all touchpoints
Evidence
Our claims are backed by specific, verifiable proof
Currency
Our story reflects where we are today, not the past
Total score /35
Most important narrative gap with Audience B
Step 2 — Narrative Profile: Audience C
Audience C name
Rate your narrative on each dimension. 1 = Weak 2 = Below average 3 = Average 4 = Strong 5 = Excellent
Dimension
What we are assessing
1
2
3
4
5
Clarity
They understand clearly what we do and why it matters
Credibility
They believe and trust our impact claims
Distinctiveness
We stand out clearly from similar organisations
Relevance
Our story speaks to what they care about
Consistency
Our narrative is the same across all touchpoints
Evidence
Our claims are backed by specific, verifiable proof
Currency
Our story reflects where we are today, not the past
Total score /35
Most important narrative gap with Audience C
Step 3 — Priority Narrative Actions
Based on your three audience profiles, identify the three narrative changes that would have the greatest cumulative effect across all audiences.
Priority
Narrative action
Audiences affected
Owner
By when
01
02
03
What Your Scores Tell You
Score band
Interpretation
28–35 per audience
Strong narrative capital. Focus on consistency across channels and building the evidence base that makes the story hold up under scrutiny.
17–27 per audience
Moderate narrative capital. Clear gaps exist. Prioritise the dimensions scoring 3 or below — these are where the narrative is failing to do its work.
Below 17
Significant narrative gap. The story needs structural work — not better communications, but a clearer and more honest account of what you do, what you have achieved, and what you stand for.